| To go back to the top of this page: Click Here To go to the Newsletters & Articles Index Page: Click Here To go to the CONTACT4LIFE Home Page: Click Here |
Down The Rabbit Hole
The Follow Up Movie to "What the Bleep?"
A Few Observations...
by D. K. Clark
You only let in what is already a part of, or conceivable in, your worldview. This movie, and the interviews,
if consciously allowed to be “let in” can expand a person’s world view.
The makers of this movie have gone to great length to help us to see other possible views into our world.
Taking pains to acknowledge what people have always thought and why those conclusions where
reached and believed. They spent the time to show how, in a continuum of historical context, with each
advancing realization of how things work… the world adjusted to a view and how that view propelled “life”
in a particular way…all according to that particular realized view. By being shown this, a person can be
assisted in lowering some of their defenses to allow a new way of viewing the world.
In the overview of historical context, the viewer was shown the separation of science and religion. While
we already knew of this… do we ever stop and think of how it affected our “now” ideas of things?
The separation allowed the full-blown growth of two political power structures, rather than the one political
power structure of the priesthood. Notice I said political power structures, not two separate endeavors…
ideally, one to see and understand the Heavenly Father’s way and one to dissect and understand the
physical world. While we want to buy the spin of religion having been about the pursuit of Yahweh’s will,
and science has been about understanding the ”real way” the world and universe works… with or without
this movie we have to acknowledge that in both fields the machinery has been bogged down by individual
human’s desire for power and pride. Entirely new views (even new ways of understanding what was
already known) have always been rejected by the existing persons in power. Rather than desiring to
know… these individuals prefer to hold on to their petty power and deny that there is something more
“true” to see.
Sadly, science has been the main area of man’s pursuit that has slowly rolled forward toward new
understanding. Religion has continued to look backward to dead men’s understanding of what they saw
and heard. Even when faced with viewing the same words in a new understanding of what could have
been meant by them… it would change an established power structure. So it has stagnated further away
from understanding instead of growing toward being in “now” knowledge of Yahweh. It’s like saying, “I
know what he meant by what he said back then, and nothing the Heavenly Father wants to say to me now
can change that.”
Oh, what full cups we have. Due to this tendency of humans clinging to the old, maybe the Heavenly
Father was left with only speaking to (or at least only being heard by) the scientific branch of seekers.
Maybe they moved slowly…but at least they moved forward toward new vision rather than imagining only
old vision could see. But then, the word religion means to “hobble”…uh, sorry…I mean to “bind together”.
Luckily, we know Yahshua differed from our view of religion’s way to be…Matthew 7:28,29. He taught with
now authoritative understanding, rather than with the “scribes” way of “this is what we are told to do in the
books.” He knew different from the standard view of how things worked. He knew enough to do the
miraculous things that were recorded. If he had agreed with and worked through (or within) their power
structure, how hobbled would he have been? Oh, in hindsight it is easy to try to spin the publicity to say
that he was with them rather than against them…but a real seeker can see past the spin and ask now,
directly to the Father in Heaven… exactly as Yahshua continued to say in various ways so it would not be
covered up completely in the records of his words.
So, the makers of this movie focused on the best way to portray what this world’s seekers are coming to
understand through their constant pursuits. Due to the fact that it is not a black and white split of religion
and science, we have the psyche area of scientific study, the matter area of scientific study, etc. Funny
enough, they (the scientists) have always spent a lot of time proving the presence of the Heavenly Father
to themselves individually while they were trying to disprove the existence of the Heavenly Father publicly.
(We know this as a historical fact outside the context of the movie.)
The movie focused on the scientists who have mostly acknowledged that through their efforts to try to
dissect the universe, they ultimately have to admit that they found a bigger picture which some call the
Heavenly Father. In their way of phrasing this idea, one could miss that they are saying that the Heavenly
Father is behind it all. But then that would be revealing that we can only hear a person describe the
Heavenly Father in an old tired way… a box with a familiar label, if you will.
Trying not to discard the divided branchs of religion, they showed how some religious types have moved
forward by going within, as was a specific sore point for Yahshua because the scribes and priests did not.
Nor did they allow their followers to do so. (They weren’t dumb, if you let the people find the Heavenly
Father within -you lose your human power base.) But…back to the movie. The “religious” types of people
contributed a possible correlation between the latest study of science and the same larger truth found
age after age when one “goes within”. One of the biggest mistakes we make is saying what “GOD” is not,
and in effect we are then placing our own perception of “GOD” in front of all He is. Maybe that’s one of the
things meant by ”have no gods before me”…huh?
(For the record, channeling is not “going within”! And also, for the record… going to the level of feeling
the oneness sensation is just scratching the inner surface. If it could be conveyed, maybe the Dr.
Quantum in Flatland comes closest…but not.)
Fantastically, this movie does more than show up our prejudices… it goes on to relate how on an
individual basis, we create (or allow to be created) effects in ourselves. In so many scientific ways, from
the water crystal studies to the biochemical emotional activity now being understood… we can realize that
we are always in the driver’s seat of our body. We can understand how, for most of our lives, we have
been reactive creators, of ourselves and our lives, instead of proactive creators.
Uh, do you think Yahshua ever gets tired of always being right but being understood very little?
You know what I mean… We use the “religious” words and phrases but familiarity has made them embody
different and watered down, if not totally wrong, instructions. To apply ourselves and really see what and
how we are in every moment is too much work for almost everyone. It takes someone who is no longer
satisfied by the cliched view of how to apply the knowledge embodied in the Heavenly Father’s
instructions to begin to hear and see them differently. That’s one of the reasons science was able to
move forward instead of totally stagnating… these people are basing their pursuit of truth on the idea that
the universe is still talking to them…is still there to be understood better and to convey more than was
known and understood before. Sadly, the bulk of religious thought is based on an unspoken and
unanalyzed idea that Yahweh has already said what he had to say. Humph!
Have “scientific” and “religious” seekers gone down wrong paths? Have they gone through dark ages? Of
course… but if you truly believe that there is something to find you continue onward. The one who looks
“backward at evidence of” instead of “forward to evidence of”…may well be revealing their fear of finding
nothing.
“Seeking first the kingdom of heaven”…reveals someone who believes it is there.
The makers of this movie show themselves as seekers… as both having received and shared.
Can we say the same? What or who do we receive from? Is it in the now or in the past? Is Yahshua our
guide or is dogma? Have we really analyzed, through new eyes, the old ideas? Is it possible that old ideas
still could teach us new things? Of course! It is a living word, or energy, embodied in the old, as well as
the new, instructions. We must not reject the backward view; we must go forward in our understanding of
it. We must not reject the forward view, either… we must look backward in our understanding of it.
P.S. Why do I make everything about the pursuit of the Heavenly Father? Because I truly believe
everything is the pursuit of the Heavenly Father. It is our perception of it that sees anything as being
outside of that. I don’t believe one breath we take is outside of that… let alone one step we take.
P.P.S. What do you think you do things for everyday?
The Follow Up Movie to "What the Bleep?"
A Few Observations...
by D. K. Clark
You only let in what is already a part of, or conceivable in, your worldview. This movie, and the interviews,
if consciously allowed to be “let in” can expand a person’s world view.
The makers of this movie have gone to great length to help us to see other possible views into our world.
Taking pains to acknowledge what people have always thought and why those conclusions where
reached and believed. They spent the time to show how, in a continuum of historical context, with each
advancing realization of how things work… the world adjusted to a view and how that view propelled “life”
in a particular way…all according to that particular realized view. By being shown this, a person can be
assisted in lowering some of their defenses to allow a new way of viewing the world.
In the overview of historical context, the viewer was shown the separation of science and religion. While
we already knew of this… do we ever stop and think of how it affected our “now” ideas of things?
The separation allowed the full-blown growth of two political power structures, rather than the one political
power structure of the priesthood. Notice I said political power structures, not two separate endeavors…
ideally, one to see and understand the Heavenly Father’s way and one to dissect and understand the
physical world. While we want to buy the spin of religion having been about the pursuit of Yahweh’s will,
and science has been about understanding the ”real way” the world and universe works… with or without
this movie we have to acknowledge that in both fields the machinery has been bogged down by individual
human’s desire for power and pride. Entirely new views (even new ways of understanding what was
already known) have always been rejected by the existing persons in power. Rather than desiring to
know… these individuals prefer to hold on to their petty power and deny that there is something more
“true” to see.
Sadly, science has been the main area of man’s pursuit that has slowly rolled forward toward new
understanding. Religion has continued to look backward to dead men’s understanding of what they saw
and heard. Even when faced with viewing the same words in a new understanding of what could have
been meant by them… it would change an established power structure. So it has stagnated further away
from understanding instead of growing toward being in “now” knowledge of Yahweh. It’s like saying, “I
know what he meant by what he said back then, and nothing the Heavenly Father wants to say to me now
can change that.”
Oh, what full cups we have. Due to this tendency of humans clinging to the old, maybe the Heavenly
Father was left with only speaking to (or at least only being heard by) the scientific branch of seekers.
Maybe they moved slowly…but at least they moved forward toward new vision rather than imagining only
old vision could see. But then, the word religion means to “hobble”…uh, sorry…I mean to “bind together”.
Luckily, we know Yahshua differed from our view of religion’s way to be…Matthew 7:28,29. He taught with
now authoritative understanding, rather than with the “scribes” way of “this is what we are told to do in the
books.” He knew different from the standard view of how things worked. He knew enough to do the
miraculous things that were recorded. If he had agreed with and worked through (or within) their power
structure, how hobbled would he have been? Oh, in hindsight it is easy to try to spin the publicity to say
that he was with them rather than against them…but a real seeker can see past the spin and ask now,
directly to the Father in Heaven… exactly as Yahshua continued to say in various ways so it would not be
covered up completely in the records of his words.
So, the makers of this movie focused on the best way to portray what this world’s seekers are coming to
understand through their constant pursuits. Due to the fact that it is not a black and white split of religion
and science, we have the psyche area of scientific study, the matter area of scientific study, etc. Funny
enough, they (the scientists) have always spent a lot of time proving the presence of the Heavenly Father
to themselves individually while they were trying to disprove the existence of the Heavenly Father publicly.
(We know this as a historical fact outside the context of the movie.)
The movie focused on the scientists who have mostly acknowledged that through their efforts to try to
dissect the universe, they ultimately have to admit that they found a bigger picture which some call the
Heavenly Father. In their way of phrasing this idea, one could miss that they are saying that the Heavenly
Father is behind it all. But then that would be revealing that we can only hear a person describe the
Heavenly Father in an old tired way… a box with a familiar label, if you will.
Trying not to discard the divided branchs of religion, they showed how some religious types have moved
forward by going within, as was a specific sore point for Yahshua because the scribes and priests did not.
Nor did they allow their followers to do so. (They weren’t dumb, if you let the people find the Heavenly
Father within -you lose your human power base.) But…back to the movie. The “religious” types of people
contributed a possible correlation between the latest study of science and the same larger truth found
age after age when one “goes within”. One of the biggest mistakes we make is saying what “GOD” is not,
and in effect we are then placing our own perception of “GOD” in front of all He is. Maybe that’s one of the
things meant by ”have no gods before me”…huh?
(For the record, channeling is not “going within”! And also, for the record… going to the level of feeling
the oneness sensation is just scratching the inner surface. If it could be conveyed, maybe the Dr.
Quantum in Flatland comes closest…but not.)
Fantastically, this movie does more than show up our prejudices… it goes on to relate how on an
individual basis, we create (or allow to be created) effects in ourselves. In so many scientific ways, from
the water crystal studies to the biochemical emotional activity now being understood… we can realize that
we are always in the driver’s seat of our body. We can understand how, for most of our lives, we have
been reactive creators, of ourselves and our lives, instead of proactive creators.
Uh, do you think Yahshua ever gets tired of always being right but being understood very little?
You know what I mean… We use the “religious” words and phrases but familiarity has made them embody
different and watered down, if not totally wrong, instructions. To apply ourselves and really see what and
how we are in every moment is too much work for almost everyone. It takes someone who is no longer
satisfied by the cliched view of how to apply the knowledge embodied in the Heavenly Father’s
instructions to begin to hear and see them differently. That’s one of the reasons science was able to
move forward instead of totally stagnating… these people are basing their pursuit of truth on the idea that
the universe is still talking to them…is still there to be understood better and to convey more than was
known and understood before. Sadly, the bulk of religious thought is based on an unspoken and
unanalyzed idea that Yahweh has already said what he had to say. Humph!
Have “scientific” and “religious” seekers gone down wrong paths? Have they gone through dark ages? Of
course… but if you truly believe that there is something to find you continue onward. The one who looks
“backward at evidence of” instead of “forward to evidence of”…may well be revealing their fear of finding
nothing.
“Seeking first the kingdom of heaven”…reveals someone who believes it is there.
The makers of this movie show themselves as seekers… as both having received and shared.
Can we say the same? What or who do we receive from? Is it in the now or in the past? Is Yahshua our
guide or is dogma? Have we really analyzed, through new eyes, the old ideas? Is it possible that old ideas
still could teach us new things? Of course! It is a living word, or energy, embodied in the old, as well as
the new, instructions. We must not reject the backward view; we must go forward in our understanding of
it. We must not reject the forward view, either… we must look backward in our understanding of it.
P.S. Why do I make everything about the pursuit of the Heavenly Father? Because I truly believe
everything is the pursuit of the Heavenly Father. It is our perception of it that sees anything as being
outside of that. I don’t believe one breath we take is outside of that… let alone one step we take.
P.P.S. What do you think you do things for everyday?
| WWW.CONTACT4LIFE.COM Studies In Spiritual Reality - Helping To Build A New Spiritual Age - Bible History / Divine Viewpoint |
